"God help the man who won't marry until he finds a perfect woman, and God help him still more if he finds her"
Marriages may be well made in heaven, the man and wife brought together at a matrominal website, their relationship solemnised in a church and consumated behind closed doors, They are definitely broken on this earth, very much in public.
When Newton said, "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction", he was possible referring to the reason behind me writing this blog. :-). All thanks to my Swedish colleague who asked me a question, "Can Indian men choose not to marry at all?". Good quesion.. isn't it? Well, all good questions have no answer.
On a very normal day , the daily dose of conversation was chugging along at snail's pace over the lunch table. As is the practise, we Indians and the dutch colleagues would be enjoying ( enjoying.. ahem... almost. I would not suggest the name of our caterer for the party at your place.) the delicatessen together. My swedish colleague asked me if Indian men (I vividly remember he asked me only about men and not women) opt not to marry at all. He questioned me on the right of Indian men to exercise their choice in a sane mind and not as a victim of circumstances viz troubled childhood, divorced parents, impotency, etc. I was not sure why he had picked me up to shot to this question at. Well, I do not look like a connoisseur on the art and science of Indian marriages, I have never been married, I am not advocate of bachelorhood err spinsterhood, I am not a product of an estranged couple (Well, my parents celebrated their 25th wedding aniversary on the 2nd of May), I am not a from-the-roof-top screaming anti-marriage feminist. I think it was the proximity... I was sitting right next to him.
The question was bolt from the blue. I began cautiously. I kept chewing on at the cutlet, pretending to be contemplating an answer, cleared my throat in as if I am on the way to deliver a rhetoric.. Let me confess, actually, I was only buying time.
Even if men choose not to get married, there are factors that may not allow them to exercise this right. Being a country, where social norms dictate ones life to a large extent, where family plays a major role in the key decisions. These decisions can range from personal, financial, marital to filial, etc.Which man can stand for long the lamenting mother, the quiet father ( Quiet, because the mother does all the talking), the inquisitive realtives, etc, etc, etc. It was hard for me to believe any man to be let without being forced into a wedLOCK, unless until he publicly proclaimed that he was queer, leading to the family severing its ties with him. In fact I thought all good men are married, or become good after getting married, which ever occurred first. So, is it the family pressure that forced a man to get married?
One of my acquaintances(Hmmm, he was a friend once upon a not so long time ago) had seen 55 girls. Not "see" as in dating, but formal girl-seeing ceremony. I must apologise here, as I am not really sure on the name given to this "boy - see - girl" ritual. Well, he had seen 55 girls before he decided on one recently. Phew, I know what you are thinking, "55 gals! Holy ghost! What was so different between them?".
Anyways, He had a huge list of qualities that he was looking for in his to-be wife. I am not sure if has a prized catch now. Or maybe it is just his age that was ticking faster than the fossil on his wrist. He was 28 going on 29 this July. So was it the ticking age that was his achilles heels? Did he realise that 56th one was the same as the 2nd or 34th and that he had been utterly duh in trying to find the difference between them?
He once complained to me that, most of his friends are already married, settled with kids and wife in tow. He visited his friend in amsterdam recently. Now this hunk was his peer. The friend guy was married, boasted of a handsome salary and a face, a cute princess and a queen at home, a couple of trips to the US of A. To make it more envious he may even own house in mumbai! His life seemed perfect, like a picture to be framed in a gold rimmed holder. For my friend, this life seemed secure and content. So, is it the peer stigma attached to an unmarried male that lead him to decide on the 56th lady as his wife?
Recently I read an article on the WebMD website on "Age Raises Infertility Risk in Men, Too", which boke the myth that men could father children as easily at 78 as they could at 18. As men age, so do their milt. Perhaps he realised that he cannot walk around like he did when he was 18. The article proved with statistics that, as men age, the probality of his offspring being born with autism, down's syndrome, schizophrenia increases. Maybe he read this article? Whatever the reason, he said, "I do". So do we attribute this as the reason for him to marry?
These are few of the reasons that I volleyd at my colleague.There are many other inherent, sustained and proven determinants, namely, the need for a man to have a wife, his intention to bear his children in a secure, stable environment within the confines of a marriage, the man-women union that forms the basis for the generations to come, the life-long companionship that one strives for, the strong need for a man to be wanted and loved, the happiness that he drives from his own family, etc. I have not dwelled upon these.
As a last note, one recent study of 17 developed nations found that "married persons have a significantly higher level of happiness than persons who are not married,". Maybe he read this article as well.
When Newton said, "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction", he was possible referring to the reason behind me writing this blog. :-). All thanks to my Swedish colleague who asked me a question, "Can Indian men choose not to marry at all?". Good quesion.. isn't it? Well, all good questions have no answer.
On a very normal day , the daily dose of conversation was chugging along at snail's pace over the lunch table. As is the practise, we Indians and the dutch colleagues would be enjoying ( enjoying.. ahem... almost. I would not suggest the name of our caterer for the party at your place.) the delicatessen together. My swedish colleague asked me if Indian men (I vividly remember he asked me only about men and not women) opt not to marry at all. He questioned me on the right of Indian men to exercise their choice in a sane mind and not as a victim of circumstances viz troubled childhood, divorced parents, impotency, etc. I was not sure why he had picked me up to shot to this question at. Well, I do not look like a connoisseur on the art and science of Indian marriages, I have never been married, I am not advocate of bachelorhood err spinsterhood, I am not a product of an estranged couple (Well, my parents celebrated their 25th wedding aniversary on the 2nd of May), I am not a from-the-roof-top screaming anti-marriage feminist. I think it was the proximity... I was sitting right next to him.
The question was bolt from the blue. I began cautiously. I kept chewing on at the cutlet, pretending to be contemplating an answer, cleared my throat in as if I am on the way to deliver a rhetoric.. Let me confess, actually, I was only buying time.
Even if men choose not to get married, there are factors that may not allow them to exercise this right. Being a country, where social norms dictate ones life to a large extent, where family plays a major role in the key decisions. These decisions can range from personal, financial, marital to filial, etc.Which man can stand for long the lamenting mother, the quiet father ( Quiet, because the mother does all the talking), the inquisitive realtives, etc, etc, etc. It was hard for me to believe any man to be let without being forced into a wedLOCK, unless until he publicly proclaimed that he was queer, leading to the family severing its ties with him. In fact I thought all good men are married, or become good after getting married, which ever occurred first. So, is it the family pressure that forced a man to get married?
One of my acquaintances(Hmmm, he was a friend once upon a not so long time ago) had seen 55 girls. Not "see" as in dating, but formal girl-seeing ceremony. I must apologise here, as I am not really sure on the name given to this "boy - see - girl" ritual. Well, he had seen 55 girls before he decided on one recently. Phew, I know what you are thinking, "55 gals! Holy ghost! What was so different between them?".
Anyways, He had a huge list of qualities that he was looking for in his to-be wife. I am not sure if has a prized catch now. Or maybe it is just his age that was ticking faster than the fossil on his wrist. He was 28 going on 29 this July. So was it the ticking age that was his achilles heels? Did he realise that 56th one was the same as the 2nd or 34th and that he had been utterly duh in trying to find the difference between them?
He once complained to me that, most of his friends are already married, settled with kids and wife in tow. He visited his friend in amsterdam recently. Now this hunk was his peer. The friend guy was married, boasted of a handsome salary and a face, a cute princess and a queen at home, a couple of trips to the US of A. To make it more envious he may even own house in mumbai! His life seemed perfect, like a picture to be framed in a gold rimmed holder. For my friend, this life seemed secure and content. So, is it the peer stigma attached to an unmarried male that lead him to decide on the 56th lady as his wife?
Recently I read an article on the WebMD website on "Age Raises Infertility Risk in Men, Too", which boke the myth that men could father children as easily at 78 as they could at 18. As men age, so do their milt. Perhaps he realised that he cannot walk around like he did when he was 18. The article proved with statistics that, as men age, the probality of his offspring being born with autism, down's syndrome, schizophrenia increases. Maybe he read this article? Whatever the reason, he said, "I do". So do we attribute this as the reason for him to marry?
These are few of the reasons that I volleyd at my colleague.There are many other inherent, sustained and proven determinants, namely, the need for a man to have a wife, his intention to bear his children in a secure, stable environment within the confines of a marriage, the man-women union that forms the basis for the generations to come, the life-long companionship that one strives for, the strong need for a man to be wanted and loved, the happiness that he drives from his own family, etc. I have not dwelled upon these.
As a last note, one recent study of 17 developed nations found that "married persons have a significantly higher level of happiness than persons who are not married,". Maybe he read this article as well.